A Superhero of the History : an outstanding Publication

Md. Tayeed Uddin Khan

10 Feb 2024, 16:07

The book arrived in my notice quite lately. Published by the Bangladesh Supreme Court Lawyers Association a a part of commemoration of 'Mujibbarsha', there is no doubt that 'A Superhero of the History' was published in continuation of the clamor of publication about Bangabandhu across the country. The compiled writings are heartwarming indeed. It became a unique book in the crowd of thousands of useless writings occupying the publication industry.

Follow Rtv Online English on Google news

The current learned attorney general A. M. Amin Uddin is in the editorial board of the compilation. Other associates are Md. Moniruzzaman, Imtiaz Farooq, Bakir Uddin Bhuiyan, Md. Humayun Kabir and Mohammad Moshiur Rahman. All of them are the then leaders of the Supreme Court Bar Association and renowned lawyers as well.

But we all have a regret. That is, the amount of work being done on Bangabandhu is unorganized and inadequate compared to what is needed. The universities also did not come forward with much interest in such research oriented works. Although 'Bangabandhu Chair' has been established in various universities, the hostels have been named. Even many buildings in the country have been named after Bangabandhu. Once an essayist lamented, 'Bangabandhu is limited only to bridges, hostels, roads, buildings, universities, museums. But beyond these, he is the whole of Bangladesh. He is mixed in every dust of every inch of this country.' This is the real Bangabandhu, his true identity.

It cannot be denied that Bangabandhu's life and work have not been compiled even today. As there was no analysis or research on Bangabandhu's overall life and activities, his philosophy, doctrine, governance. Although there was much criticism on the political part of the program of his second revolution, there was not the least discussion or criticism on its economic, social program. His vision remained unchallenged. None of his colleagues, followers - came forward to shed light on the matter. Rather, he remained silent for fear of being criticized by the detractors. No significant research has been done on the program of the Second Revolution.

On the other hand, many books on Bangabandhu's life and work are available in the market. Most of the authors are anonymous. Many books are not even worth touching. Unfortunately, real Bangabandhu is absent in those writings. No evaluation, no analysis. After reading many books, it seems that those should be discarded. Those who were companions of Bangabandhu did not come forward to write memoirs. The politicians created by him have also shown miserliness in this regard. If they had written, then a lot of information about Bangabandhu and contemporary history would have been available. And because it did not go away, unnecessary lies about Bangabandhu have increased. He has been the victim of propaganda the most. But end of the day he has come out as an enlightened person, the best son of the Bengali nation.

Everyone should read the memorial book 'Itihaser Mahanayak' to know the enlightened and greatest Bengali father of the nation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. In this book Bangabandhu's daughter Hon'ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and Bangabandhu's other daughter Sheikh Rehana wrote two memoirs. The country's best jurists, well-known judges and a number of famous intellectuals of the country have contributed in this anthology; through which the life and works of the Father of the Nation have been truly glorified. The writings will be very useful for those who will do classical research about him in the future.

Others who wrote in this memorial book: Justice Iman Ali, Justice Md. Nuruzzaman, Justice Obaidul Hasan, Md Nurul Islam Sujan MP, Sh Rezaul Karim MP, Barrister Sheikh Fazle Noor Tapas, Md Mahbub Ali MP, Justice M Inayetur Rahim, former Law Minister Abdul Matin Khasru, Justice Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik, Yusuf Hossain Humayun, Abdul Baset Majumder, Syed Rezaur Rahman, Dr. Harun-ur-Rashid, Prof. Dr. Mizanur Rahman, AAMS Arefin Siddique, Prof. Dr. Mizanur Rahman, Harun Habib, Kashem Humayun, Mohammad Manjurul Islam, Md. Moniruzzaman, Imtiaz Farooq, Md. Bakir Uddin Bhuiyan, Md. Humayun Kabir and Md. Moshiur Rahman.

Apart from this, several chapters dealing closely with Bangabandhu's life and politics have been inserted, which will be very essential for the readers. For example, a chapter has been inserted on what prominent citizens of the international arena have commented on Bangabandhu. The books written by Bangabandhu are also included. There is also a chapter on Bangabandhu's speech in Bengali to the United Nations General Assembly. 130 pages beyond the main article are filled with such rare discussions. That is why the book is different from other publications. Another notable aspect is the important inclusion of photographs from various periods along with a brief biography of the Father of the Nation.

The Supreme Court Bar Association has performed a national duty by publishing this memorandum. In the crowd of thousands of cheap books, a thoughtful book is the hope of the age. This is one such publication. But there are some limitations about the book. It is not a very accessible book. Although the publication was administered Pathak Samabesh, any interested reader will not find the book in market. Only Supreme Court lawyers can collect the book. I hope that the respected editorial board will try to overcome these limitations of the book in the next edition and make it more universal and accessible.

Anisuzzaman Sohel, a prominent painter of the country, designed the cover of the 'A Superhero of the History' memorial book. He deserves special thanks.

Author: Supreme Court lawyer, former banker and filed first complaint against Bangabandhu's killers

Comments

Most Viewed News Of Others

Student politics can be reintroduced at BUET campus: VC

Vice-Chancellor of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) Satya Prasad Majumder has said student politics can be reintroduced on the campus if teachers and students want. He told to reporters on Sunday (March 31) at noon. Dr. Satya Prasad Majumder said that the teachers and students had decided to ban politics in BUET earlier, they will have to take initiative again to change that decision. If they decide, then maybe politics can reintroduced at the campus. At the same time, the BUET Vice-Chancellor urged the protesters to take part in the class and examination. The students claimed that the BCL central leaders had organized a program at the campus around 1am amid the ban. Meanwhile, Bangladesh Students League (BSL) leaders and activists paid homage to Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman by placing floral wreaths at his mural at the BUET campus on Saturday. Earlier, BUET student Abrar was tortured to death by student leaders in 2019. At that time, student politics was banned on paper in the context of the demands of teachers and students. At the same time, the general students claim that politics did not stop even for a moment in the institution. Rather, extremist political organizations are taking advantage of the ban on student politics.

High Court allows student politics in BUET

The High Court has postponed the decision to ban political organisations and activities in Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) and allows student politics. Justice Md Khasruzzaman and Justice KM Zahid on Monday (April 1) passed the order over hearing a writ petition. Earlier in the morning, a writ petition was filed with the High Court seeking permission continue systematic student politics on BUET. The writ petition was filed in the relevant branch of the High Court. On October 11, 2019, BUET student Imtiaz Hossain Rahim filed the writ petition challenging the legality of the 'emergency notice' issued by the BUET authorities.

The Indian Product Boycott Movement vs. Reclaiming the Hat

It’s best not to discuss or mention the type of person who announced the start of the Indian Product Boycott Movement. However, it was surprising to see some BNP political party leaders and supporters engage in such an unrealistic endeavor. There exists a persistent anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh, deeply entrenched and hard to eradicate. This sentiment stems not only from the country’s partition or the Pakistan movement. Despite the division of the Indian subcontinent first into two and then into three parts, the underlying issue has always been religious. The emergence of these three countries was not based on modern principles, and religious influence still pervades among the leftists, rightists, and nationalists alike. Furthermore, these nations have yet to adopt any practical diplomacy and politics that could unite the culturally similar populations of this subcontinent. Politics in these countries are so ingrained in society that they overshadow common cultural heritage. On the surface, the cultured individuals in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh do not harbor hatred or division. However, they are in the minority. For the majority of the populace, the mindset is uniform. From Bangladesh, it may appear that anti-India sentiment is rampant within its borders. This opposition often becomes pronounced during elections or for political maneuvering. Conversely, the common people across India do not generally hold negative views about Bangladesh, which has minimal impact on India’s politics and economy. Thus, there is no significant basis for anti-Bangladesh sentiment in India. However, I have observed some journalists and professors in India expressing frustration, questioning whether India must provide food for Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh. Currently, Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh have gained importance to India for security reasons. Many journalists who were initially annoyed about providing aid have substantially revised their opinions. They now support a friendly government in Bangladesh, understanding that China’s influence is expanding not only through Tista’s Chicken Neck and off the coast of Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal but also in parts of Chittagong. Hence, for their national security interests, Indian concerns extend beyond Bangladesh to West Bengal as well. Future changes in the political landscape or borders of West Bengal, driven by security needs, would not be surprising. All these developments occur as India is poised to become the world’s third-largest economic power, with a GDP currently surpassing that of China. In today’s political landscape, it is unrealistic to expect the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which has not only governed the nation multiple times but also played a pivotal role in SAARC during its 1991 tenure, to start opposing any SAARC country—even if by mistake. The BNP boasts numerous educated leaders and high-caliber professionals within its ranks. They are well aware that product boycotts and non-cooperation movements have historically never succeeded. India’s Sarvodaya leader, Jayaprakash Narayan, acknowledged that the only successful non-cooperation movement occurred in Bangladesh in 1971. Despite his leftist leanings and admiration for Gandhi, Narayan viewed the Bangladeshi non-cooperation movement through Gandhi’s principles. However, this movement, led by Bangabandhu against the West Pakistan government, was not the endeavor of an opposition party. As an elected representative, Bangabandhu and his party were effectively the authority at that time. Although his party secured all its seats in East Pakistan, the West Pakistan-centric military government was reluctant to transfer power. Realizing that negotiations with Pakistan had reached a dead end, Bangabandhu took it upon himself to assert control in East Pakistan—soon to be Bangladesh. His initial step was to administer East Pakistan as per his directives rather than those of West Pakistan’s central government. Given that he was an elected leader, not only the populace but also the administrative machinery supported him. Despite knowing this historical truth, the BNP lost to political strategies on October 28, 2023, they called for a non-cooperation movement. They received no significant response there. Yet, why some leaders and activists of the BNP—a party that has come to power several times—rely on the intellect and opinions of those dependent on Facebook and YouTube to engage in a boycott of Indian products is truly astonishing! Critics of this movement would benefit from understanding Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s late-life reflections on his initiatives. Professor Nirmal Kumar Bose, Gandhi’s one-time private secretary, questioned the effectiveness of the foreign product boycott and the use of the spinning wheel. Gandhi responded that spinning increased concentration, a rationale that frustrated Bose. He found Gandhi’s explanation unsatisfactory and reflective of a ‘schoolmasterly’ demeanor, preferring to impose his views rather than foster understanding. Bose, with his urban sensibilities, choose silence over confrontation with Gandhi’s rural mindset. Thus, if BNP proponents of the boycott claim they are following Gandhi’s path to enhance focus, their rationale cannot be disputed further. However, it must be acknowledged that the Indian Product Boycott Movement is unlikely to succeed, and it will not lead to anarchy. Essential and affordable products cannot be eradicated from the market. During Gandhi’s time, even the impoverished who supported his movements wore British mill-made clothes. Similarly, the absence of food riots today can be attributed to the availability of products in the market. Such chaos typically arises only when essential goods are inaccessible. Moreover, the gap between the twentieth century, when Gandhi initiated the product boycott, and today’s global commercial landscape is immense, akin to the distance from the Earth to space. In the contemporary world, products from various countries are readily available side by side in markets everywhere. Consumers simply choose what they prefer. Presently, there is more contention between the people of America and China than between those of Bangladesh and India. Yet, despite the tensions, Bangladesh remains one of the top countries whose citizens frequently visit India. Similarly, Chinese tourists are among the highest in the United States. These tourists do not solely sightsee; they also purchase local products. Thus, regardless of calls in Bangladesh to boycott Indian goods, the multitude of tourists traveling daily are not carrying Bangladeshi items. Instead, they return with Indian goods and potentially, products from other countries like China, Vietnam, Britain, and the USA bought in India. Likewise, Chinese visitors to the US do not restrict their purchases to American products; they also buy items from Indonesia and other nations. In an era of global free trade, where the movement of goods is liberalized and consumers universally embrace the principle of sourcing from the most cost-effective markets, no politically savvy party that aims to govern in the modern world would adopt an outdated, impractical strategy like Gandhi’s product boycott. Recent reports from BNP’s initial policy-making meeting confirm this modern approach. According to the newspapers, Iqbal Mahmud Tuku, one of their policymakers, asserted that the statement made by Rizvi was his own opinion and not representative of the party. Meanwhile, another senior policymaker, Amir Khosru Chowdhury, emphasized that Rizvi’s decisions or statements do not reflect the party’s stance. On the other hand, isn’t the BNP’s frustration with the elections solely centered around India a kind of mistake? Didn’t China also want continuity in their investments here? Did the West only want ballots here? How much of democracy worldwide is actually in the hands of the ballot now! Instead, the BNP needs to understand that they were the ones who started corporate-controlled politics in this country, albeit on a small scale. But the Awami League has taken that Hat from them. Therefore, it shouldn’t be hard for the BNP’s senior policy makers to focus on retrieving their own Hat rather than looking towards movements like boycotting Indian products influenced by Facebook and YouTube users. Swadesh Roy is a highest national award-winning journalist in Bangladesh, Editor and Publisher of Sarakhon & The Present World. Source: The Present World

Schools and colleges to remain closed for 7 days

Heat alert has been issued in various parts of the country due to severe heatwave. In this situation, the Directorate of Secondary & Higher Education has extended the holidays of all secondary schools and colleges in the country till April 27 considering the health and safety of the students. This information was given in a notification from the Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education on Saturday (April 20). According to the notification, primary and secondary schools will remain closed for seven days from Apr 21 to Apr 27. In this regard, Mahbubur Rahman Tuhin, senior information officer at the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education said that secondary level schools and colleges will remain closed till April 27 due to the heatwave. Regular classes will begin on April 28. Earlier, the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education announced the closure of the primary school assembly through a notification due to the ongoing heatwave in the country. The Ministry of Primary and Mass Education is keeping a close watch on the heatwave across the country. Considering the situation, all government primary school assemblies in the country will remain closed until further notice.

DU classes to be held virtually amid heatweave

Dhaka University (DU) authorities have decided to hold classes virtually until further notice due to the ongoing heatwave. The university authorities made the announcement on Thursday (21 April). According to a press release issued by DU today, the online classes will be held until further notice. However, the residential halls at the university will remain open, Prof Sitesh Chandra Bachar of DU said.

Dozens arrested as US campus protests over Gaza spread

Protests against the ongoing war in Gaza have spread at Yale University in Connecticut and New York University in Manhattan in the United States. Police arrested dozens of people on Monday night to disperse the ongoing protests at New York University. The British media BBC reported. Authorities arrested at least 47 protesters on the Yale University campus in New Haven. The university confirmed the matter in a statement. The ongoing protests on U.S. campuses captured the world's attention last week when New York City police arrested more than 100 protesting students on the campus of Columbia University. As part of the protest, the students setting up tent encampments at its New York City campus last week. Authorities have expelled the arrested students from the university after the police made the arrests. Hundreds of Columbia University teachers staged a mass walkout on Monday to protest the arrests of students protesting on their campuses. In addition, the authorities announced on Monday that all classes of the university will be conducted virtually. Meanwhile, protests in support of Palestine are taking place at major US educational institutions, including the University of California at Berkeley, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the University of Michigan and Emerson College. But many U.S. politicians and campus-based organizations are claiming the protests as an anti-Semitic movement.

Sonia to receive PNS-Bipasha Guhathakurata award

Nazrul-sangeet singer Mirajul Jannat Sonia has been nominated as the finalist for PNS-Bipasha Guhathakurta Memorial Award-2024. The award will be officially handed over to the recipient on April 30. Remembering the fondest memories of late artist Bipasha Guthakurta, 'PNS-Bipasha Guhathakurta Smriti Sammanna' was launched from this year. The award includes cash and crest. Bipasha Guhathakurata was the founder of popular cultural organisation Prasanga Nazrul Sangeet (PNS). Artist Mirajul Jannat Sonia is a known face in Nazrul sector. She is a disciple of Pandit Ullas Kaslkar of the classical genre of music.