• Dhaka Sat, 27 APRIL 2024,
logo
Iraq: 4 killed in drone attack on gas field
Could Japan allow a woman to be emperor?
Conservatives have largely dropped a fiercely-held opposition to a woman assuming Japan's throne as empress. But critics say their proposals could still rule out a female head of the world's oldest hereditary monarchy. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Japan appears to be inching toward changing the law to expand the imperial family and head off a succession crisis in the world's oldest monarchy. Critics, however, have cautioned that conservative lawmakers still intend to ensure that any new legislation does not open the way for a woman to finally assume the East Asian nation's Chrysanthemum Throne. Representatives of parties from across the political spectrum are expected to convene a meeting in early May to address an issue that has hung over the nation's royalty for more than a decade. The LDP indicated a shift in its position earlier this month, which means progress toward a future empress may finally be possible. Traditionalist hard-liners had previously resisted change, but the party now says two proposals first suggested in 2021 are "reasonable."  One suggestion would permit female members of the imperial family to retain their royal status after they marry instead of becoming commoners who are not, as a consequence, able to produce a male heir to the throne. Changes to Imperial Household Law The second suggestion is to reinstate branches of the family that were lopped off shortly after Japan's surrender at the end of World War II, as the occupation authorities sought to dramatically reduce the influence of the emperor. Adopting those branches back into the imperial family would give it a far larger pool of descendants of the emperor and a far greater likelihood of a male heir. "To me, this appears to be a good sign, a sign that the LDP is finally listening to the opinion polls on the future of the imperial family," said Hiromi Murakami, a professor of political science at the Tokyo campus of Temple University. Under the terms of the Imperial Household Law, only male descendants from the male line of the imperial family can become emperor in Japan. However, polls conducted in recent years have consistently indicated that more than 70% of the public are in favor of legal changes that would permit an empress. "Conservatives have pushed back against that idea and insisted on old-fashioned ideals across a male-dominated society," Murakami told DW. "But it is encouraging to see that changing." By law, only a male can become emperor in Japan. Emperor Naruhito — who took over in May 2019 after the abdication of his father Akihito — only has a daughter, Princess Aiko. His younger brother, Prince Akishino, also only has daughters, which has prompted talks of a succession crisis. Japan is world's oldest hereditary monarchy The threat of no male heir to the throne — and the end of an imperial line that can trace its roots back to the legendary sun goddess Amaterasu in 660 B.C. — was solved in September 2006 when Prince Akishino's wife gave birth to a son, Prince Hisahito. Successive governments have recognized, however, that a single male heir is not a long-term solution to the shrinking imperial family. In recent years, they have set up a series of panels to explore ways to ensure that a monarchy that is much-loved by the vast majority of Japanese people can continue. And while the proposals might appear to be a step in the right direction, Yohei Mori, a professor at Tokyo's Seijo University who researches the relationship between the imperial family and the Japanese people, cautioned they are merely the "machinations" of traditionalists in government. "Both these plans are the result of machinations of conservatives opposed to female emperors," he said. "They have lobbied hard in the Diet [the national legislature — Editor's note] to persuade others in the LDP and the opposition that the male lineage is the Japanese 'tradition'." As a result, Mori said, these "ridiculous proposals" have been accepted as the two possibilities. Permitting female members of the imperial family to retain their status "is still conservative," he pointed out, as their commoner husbands and male offspring would still not be permitted to become emperor in the future. Equally, the traditionalists are "pleased" at the proposal for former branches of the family to be reincorporated as this will reinforce the male lineage requirement. "I believe the Japanese public is broadly in favor of legal changes that would enlarge the imperial family, whether it is a female emperor or a female lineage emperor, and supports changing a system in which only men have dominated the throne," said Mori. "This is because it is unreasonable to limit the number of emperors to men in an age when gender equality is being called for." The UK, Spain and other European nations have long embraced the concept of a female monarch, he said. Male succession likely to remain tradition "The problem is the activities of a small number of conservatives, who have had a big influence on legislators and convinced them that male succession is the tradition in Japan," said Mori. Ultimately, he isn't optimistic that either of the proposals will be formally adopted because an amendment to the Imperial Household Law requires unanimous support — and the left-leaning Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), the country's largest opposition party, remains committed to changes that would permit a female emperor. "If the LDP would compromise with the CDPJ and accept the proposal for a female emperor, things could move," he said. "However, it is unlikely that the LDP would compromise that far, given the inevitable backlash from conservative groups. Without a major compromise, there is no chance that the panel's proposal will be implemented."
30 years on, South Africa's dream of unity lies shattered
Germany's Autobahn — finally time for a speed limit?
Turkey-Iraq ties: Renewed progress, but PKK issue remains
EU elections: What have lawmakers achieved since 2019?
Nearly 282 million people faced hunger in 2023: Report
The number of people suffering acute food insecurity rose in 2023 for the fifth year in a row, according to a UN-led report. Conflicts, extreme weather and economic shocks are worsening the food crisis many people face. Almost 282 million people suffered from acute hunger in 2023, according to a UN-led report released on Wednesday. The report said that conflicts, extreme weather events and economic shocks were fueling food insecurity worldwide. What did the report say about global hunger? The global report on food crises from the Food Security Information Network (FSIN), called the outlook "bleak," adding that the number of people facing food insecurity grew by 24 million compared to 2022. The report was produced jointly by several UN agencies, the European Union, government bodies and NGOs. 2023 was the fifth year in a row that saw a rise in the number of people suffering acute food insecurity. "In a world of plenty, children are starving to death," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in the report's foreword. "War, climate chaos and a cost-of-living crisis — combined with inadequate action — mean that almost 300 million people faced acute food crisis in 2023," he said. "Funding is not keeping pace with need." Where is food insecurity most prevalent? Major food crises are ongoing in Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Syria and Yemen. Last year, food insecurity became more severe in Sudan due to the conflict between the army and the RSF paramilitary, as well as in the Gaza Strip amid Israel's offensive in the Palestinian territory. Worsening conditions in Haiti were due to reduced agricultural production and political instability, with armed gangs taking over parts of the country's capital, Port-au-Prince. The report also warned that the El Nino weather phenomenon could lead to severe drought in western and southern Africa. Several countries in southern Africa have declared national emergencies due to the drought, including Zimbabwe earlier this month and Malawi in March. Some 700,000 people, including 600,000 in Gaza, were on the brink of starvation last year.
Tennessee passes bill to let teachers carry guns at school
The move comes a year after three children and three staff were killed in a school shooting in Nashville. The bill will now be sent to Republican Governor Bill Lee for consideration. Lawmakers in the US state of Tennessee passed a law on Tuesday that would allow teachers to carry concealed guns in schools. The bill passed 68-28 vote in Tennessee's Republican-dominated legislature, as protesters shouted from the visitors gallery, "Blood on your hands."  It will now be sent for consideration by Governor Bill Lee, a Republican. "What you're doing is you're creating a deterrent," said Republican State Representative Ryan Williams, who sponsored the bill. "Across our state, we have had challenges as it relates to shootings." All Democrats plus four Republicans voted against the proposal. "My Republican colleagues continue to hold our state hostage, hold our state at gunpoint to appeal to their donors in the gun industry," said Democratic State Representative Justin Jones. "It is morally insane." What does the bill allow? The law would require any person wishing to carry a concealed handgun inside a school to complete at least 40 hours of training in school policing, as well as an additional 40 hours of training per year. School leaders must give approval for an individual to carry a gun, and local law enforcement must be informed of the person's identity. About half of all states in the US allow teachers or other school staff to carry firearms on school grounds, according to the Giffords Law Center, a gun safety group. School shootings have becoming increasingly common tragedy in recent years. The Tennessee bill comes a little more than a year after an assailant shot dead three children and three staff at a Nashville elementary school.  
Electric cars sales expected to rise to new record in 2024
The International Energy Agency is forecasting that one in five cars sold globally is set to be electric. China continues to dominate the global market. The International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Tuesday that 2024 will be record-setting for electric vehicles sales, with China leading the market. The Paris-based energy watchdog forecasted that electric car sales will hit 17 million this year, compared to 14 million in 2023. More than one in five cars sold globally is set to be electric, according to the IEA.  "Rather than tapering off, the global EV revolution appears to be gearing up for a new phase of growth," said IEA Director Fatih Birol. "The wave of investment in battery manufacturing suggests the EV supply chain is advancing to meet automakers' ambitious plans for expansion. As a result, the share of EVs on the roads is expected to continue to climb rapidly." Sales varying by region Growth in Europe is slowed by "a generally weak outlook for passenger car sales and the phase-out of subsidies in some countries," according to the IEA.  Electric cars are expected to hit 45% of all car sales in China, growing strongly in Europe with 25% and in the US with 11%. As for charging networks, they must expand six-fold by 2035, the IEA states. Lower profit margins and instability of prices for raw materials for batteries, as well high inflation and the termination of subsidy programs had sparked worry about the sector's growth. An increase in the second-hand market also contributes to the lowering of electric technology access. According to IEA, in 2030 around one in three cars in China should be electric, and one in five in Europe and the United States.  
Why the US might put sanctions on an Israeli army battalion
An Israeli army battalion, Netzah Yehuda, may, among other things, be excluded from receiving US financial support. The US has never imposed sanctions on the Israeli army before. Numerous media outlets are reporting that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to announce sanctions against a battalion of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The unit, known as Netzah Yehuda (Judea Forever), has been accused of human rights violations against Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. According to the Associated Press news agency, the US has been investigating five army units for serious human rights violations. These sanctions, however, would only apply to this unit, imposing two restrictions: Firstly, no US military aid would go to Netzah Yehuda; secondly, its participation in training programs financed by the US would be limited. The Israeli government has already declared that it will oppose the sanctions. What is Netzah Yehuda? The Netzah Yehuda battalion was established in the late 1990s as a special religious unit, with specific conditions to facilitate military service for ultra-orthodox Jews (Haredim). The men are given time for prayer and religious studies, their food is kosher, and contact with female soldiers is very limited. The battalion is part of the Kfir Infantry Brigade, which says it numbers around 1,000 soldiers in total. The majority of the ultra-orthodox community opposes compulsory military service, making this a contentious issue. Many of the soldiers in the battalion joined voluntarily because Haredim have always been exempt from military service in Israel. Those who attended a yeshiva (a religious school) up to a certain age, for instance, cannot be called up into the IDF. However, more and more politicians are calling for the rule to be changed. Israel's Supreme Court ruled back in 1998 that it was discriminatory. And since October 2023, with the start of the war in Gaza against the militant group Hamas — which the US, EU, and others designate a terrorist group — thousands of Haredim have volunteered for military service. Rallying point for radical settlers? The unit is made up of both ultra-orthodox and religious-nationalist Israelis. These include radical settlers from the occupied West Bank who have close ties to the parties of right-wing extremist government ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir. According to the US news website Axios, more and more of the so-called "Hilltop Youth" have joined the battalion over the years. This group consists of young, radical, sometimes violent settlers. Just last week, the EU sanctioned the Hilltop Youth for their attacks on Palestinians. Netzah Yehuda was originally stationed in the occupied West Bank, but it was relocated to northern Israel at the end of 2022. The battalion has now also been deployed in the war in the Gaza Strip. What exactly is the battalion accused of? The Times of Israel reports that Netzah Yehuda has been linked to right-wing extremism and violence against Palestinians. According to the Axios website, the battalion first came to the attention of the US government in 2022, with incidents of violence against Palestinian civilians. Members of the battalion are said to have detained an almost 80-year-old man, Omar Assad, and kept him bound and gagged for hours. Assad, a Palestinian-American, died a few hours later of a stress-induced heart attack. As reported by the Washington Post and other outlets, an autopsy found that this was likely brought on by his being manhandled. The IDF condemned the incident at the time, describing it as a "moral failure," and a poor decision on the part of those responsible. Two officers were dismissed and a third was reprimanded, but no criminal charges were brought. The incident attracted attention because of the man's dual nationality, his advanced age, and because the US called for an investigation. However, human rights activists can cite numerous other cases of alleged mistreatment and torture of Palestinians. How has Israel reacted? The Israeli government has expressed outrage at reports of impending sanctions. On Saturday evening, President Benjamin Netanyahu posted on X (formerly Twitter): "Sanctions must not be imposed on the Israel Defense Forces!" and declaring that his government was working to prevent any such measures. His post continued: "At a time when our soldiers are fighting the monsters of terror, the intention to impose sanctions on an IDF unit is the height of absurdity and a moral low." The Israeli military has stated that it is not aware of any sanctions against any of its units, and said: "If a decision is made on the matter, it will be reviewed." Is the US considering further sanctions? Sanctions against the Israeli army are a new development, but the US has previously imposed sanctions against Israel, such as recently against extremist settlers, and against the right-wing extremist Bentzi Gopstein, an ally of Itamar Ben Gvir, the far-right minister for national security. The US also put on its sanctions list two organizations that provide financial support for sanctioned extremist settlers. Their assets in the US have been blocked. US citizens and others in the US are also forbidden from engaging in any transactions with sanctioned organizations and individuals.
Ghana's cocoa farmers are losing out, despite record prices
The price of cocoa on the global market soared to a record high in April, but African farmers are struggling to make ends meet. In countries like Ghana, the local pricing system has left many frustrated and hopeless. In the Afigya Kwabre district of Ghana's Ashanti region, people like Kingsley Owusu are known for growing Ghana's leading cash crop. Owusu and his community have been growing cocoa beans for over 30 years. For many years, the cocoa harvest allowed him to take care of his children, who have all grown to adulthood. But now, at the age of 60, Owusu is worried about his own livelihood. "My production levels have gone down because of climate change and diseases. And illegal mining activities are also contributing to this," Owusu told DW, adding that he barely makes enough to get by. Owusu used to produce about 10 bags of cocoa per season, but now he struggles to fill even three. As a result, he has far less cash in hand than he used to. Ghana steps in to help farmers The Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), which regulates the sector, recently announced that it would significantly increase what it pays cocoa farmers per ton. COCOBOD said in a statement that "the increase in the producer price of cocoa has become necessary to enhance the income of cocoa farmers." From the previous rate of 20,928 Ghanaian cedis (€1,460/$1,557) per ton, it pledged an increase of nearly 60%, meaning it would pay farmers 33,120 cedis per ton moving forward. That translates to 2,070 cedis per bag of cocoa with a gross weight of 64 kilograms. But farmers like Owusu have taken issue with the government's new pricing policy. Ghana farmers feel left out of decision-making "Per the world price, we should be receiving more," he told DW, highlighting that this month, the price of cocoa on the world market had reached $10,000 per ton. The price for cocoa is chiefly determined at commodity futures markets in New York and London, which are largely driven by supply and demand. However, the way cocoa beans are sold is based on different standards in each country, with cocoa trading systems across Africa often varying greatly in their structures. In Ivory Coast, for example, the leading producer on the continent, farmers can sell their beans to cooperatives which they belong to, or they can trade directly with private buying companies. But in Ghana, the world's second-largest exporter of the precious bean, there is a long-established mechanism which limits farmers in a number of ways. They cannot trade with external buyers, and thus lack control over their own pricing. They can only sell their beans to the state agency COCOBOD, which then trades that product on the global market. Moses Djan Asiedu, board secretary of the West African Cocoa Farmers Organization, agrees with the concerns voiced by local farmers in Ghana. "COCOBOD is a pricemaker, and the price established [is] beyond [the control of] the farmers. And we think that the facility that is establishing the price is not a fair thing," he told DW. Ghana's centralized cocoa policy aims to stabilize market Meanwhile, the spokesperson for COCOBOD, Fiifi Boafo, told DW that when cocoa prices on the global market increase, it does not immediately affect farmers' pockets. "The increment in price [changes] at the international market is something that we get excited about — excited because this provides farmers with opportunities to improve revenue," he explained, adding that they deal in "forward sales" with farmers. But Ghana's policy of forwarding cocoa sales prices means producers are reliant on the prices the government agrees to, without having an independent say in the matter. COCOBOD said this policy is intended to allow for both the government and cocoa-producing farmers to have some collective control over the mechanisms of supply and demand on the commodities market, securing future cocoa supplies to address any risks in price volatility while also stabilizing the market. But Asiedu said this arrangement leaves cocoa-producing countries like Ghana helpless in securing fair pricing for all, and said this must change. "There is no fairness. That is why COCOBOD also agrees to [accept] whatever is given," he said. Malawi's first and only female chocolate farmer Asiedu said local farmers in Ghana deserve to get more than just a fraction of the price their beans are sold for, and blames government involvement in the production process for shortchanging producers. "The government only [looks at] the cost involved in handling the cocoa before they offer a price for the farmers," he told DW. Boafo agreed that this policy of forward selling Ghana's cocoa may not present farmers with opportunities to reap the full benefits of their output, especially now that prices are up on the world market. However, he believes Ghana's policy also has its benefits, and that is has protected farmers in the past by establishing reliable rates for their crops. Are farmers facing an untamable market? According to Asiedu of the West African Cocoa Farmers Organization, Ghana might be running out of time to save the cocoa sector. Many farmers are either abandoning their businesses or retiring without having anyone who could inherit their farm. "Most farmers, about 70%, are overaged. And they lack the strength to maintain their farms, especially if they do not get enough money [...] for their labor. So they abandon their farms," Asiedu explained. To halt this trend, both Ivory Coast and Ghana took an unusual step in 2019 to improve farmers' living conditions. They declared that cocoa buyers would have to pay an additional premium of $400 per metric ton of cocoa beans purchased to compensate for the changing and aging cocoa labor market — the so-called living income differential. However, a new study by the humanitarian organization Oxfam, released at the World Cocoa Conference, shows that this approach has failed, partly on account of the rising commodity prices. But the policy also crashed in part because traders also pay a negotiated premium for cocoa that is based on qualities like taste, fat content or bean size — what is called the "country differential." "At least if [the price on the global market] came in at a certain level where the farmer would always be comfortable enough to still produce and the buyer would also be able to afford [cocoa], we could sustain this," Boafo told DW. "But in this situation, where the market is not working in the interest of the cocoa farmer, it becomes difficult for the sustainability of the industry." Oxfam's study reveals that cocoa buyers simply reduced the country differentials for Ivory Coast and Ghana after these countries had introduced the $400 premium to support farmers. No more chocolate? Meanwhile, there is already another major crisis brewing on the cocoa horizon in these two leading producer countries: production levels have gone down drastically in recent years. In the crop season between 2021 and 2022, Ghana produced about 750,000 metric tons of cocoa beans. But since then, cocoa production has dropped sharly. Ghana's cocoa output for the season lasting between 2023 and 2024 is now expected to be down by almost 40%. Boafo said this shortage of beans was the trigger for recent prices surpassing $10,000 per ton on the world market.  Asiedu explained that in addition to not fetching fair prices for cocoa beans, the sector also faces serious threats from climate change and other factors. "We now have unusual rainfall, unusual sunshine, and sometimes you cannot predict this. We also have quite a number of [other] issues, like diseases, which farmers would have to control," he told DW. "And sometimes access to chemicals to combat [diseases] also becomes an issue." Boafo added that in order to protect the sector and fight global warming, smart farming methods needed to be adopted. "Climate change is a major concern," he said. "It is key that we are able to deal with the effects of climate change." But whether the issue is climate change, commodity prices, pests, output rates or incentives to continue the cocoa trade, it would appear that the countries that produce the precious beans don't have much power to influence the price outcome. That power, it seems, lies almost exclusively with the chocolate buyers and their middlemen.