• Dhaka Wed, 08 MAY 2024,
logo
5 Chinese workers killed in bombing
PoK residents protest against load shedding; shops closed
A joint protest by scholars, journalists and businessmen was held against load shedding in Muzaffarabad , Pakistan-occupied Kashmir ( PoK ). A complete shutter-down strike was also observed and the locals called on the government to act quickly to stop load shedding. The load-shedding, according to demonstrators, is now intolerable and they are forced to take to the streets. A protester said, "I would like to thank everyone for closing their shops. The administration forced you to close your shops. No shopkeeper closes his shop; he sits in his shop in the morning and takes something for his family and kids. For the last five days, tailors in this area are suffering a lot. Have a fear of God. When God's stick is used, everyone is crushed in it. I request the administration and the new DC to take notice of it." The residents of the occupied region are accusing the Pakistani government of unfair treatment. The locals say that the government keeps sending them high electricity bills despite the fact that electricity is always cut off and load shedding is common in the area. In September, civil society activists were seen throwing thousands of electricity bills into a river in Muzaffarabad. Highly inflated bills have put undue financial strain on the people who live in the region, which produces large amounts of electricity. Another protester said, "This terrible injustice has been going on for the last five days. These madrassa students, tailors and residents have been worried for the last five days. You all are forcing us to intensify this protest in other areas." The residents are not able to perform prayers in mosques due to the lack of electricity. The situation is even worse in the rural and remote areas of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. "Electricity has been turned off in Jama Masjid. People are offering namaz (prayer) in Jama Masjid by using candles and lamps. I condemn this. This is the condition of our cities. You can understand what kind of situation there must be in villages," said a protester. Since the unlawful occupation of PoK by Islamabad, the locals in the region have faced all kinds of challenges. The successive governments in Islamabad have treated them unjustly and they have never been given the rights they deserve. In recent years, the people in the area have started to voice their grievances against the government of Islamabad.  Source: ANI
Pakistan’s Neglect of Gurdwara
Statistics paint alarming child labour picture
Dara Shikoh Foundation writes to UNESCO over Pakistan destroying 'Sharda Peeth' in PoK to build coffee house for soldiers.
Pakistan: Rainwater goes waste as govt fails to create storage facilities
Pakistan: Two persons killed, 3 soldiers among 10 injured in suicide attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Bannu
Two persons were killed and 10 others, including three Pakistan army soldiers, were injured in a suicide attack on a convoy of security forces in the Baka Khel area of Bannu district in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan-based Dawn reported citing the military's media affairs wing. In a statement, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said that a "motorcycle-borne suicide bomber" detonated himself at a security forces convoy on Sunday. According to ISPR, the bomber was affiliated with the Hafiz Gul Bahadur Group and "later identified as an Afghan national". According to ISPR, two civilians were killed while seven civilians and three soldiers were wounded in the attack. The ISPR said that a sanitisation operation is being conducted to eliminate any other terrorists found in the area, according to Dawn report. The ISPR said that eight terrorists were killed in an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in the Sararogha area of Pakistan's South Waziristan, Dawn reported. Two soldiers were killed after an improvised explosive device (IED) exploded on a security forces convoy in the Razmak area of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's North Waziristan district. Notably, Pakistan has witnessed a rise in terrorist attacks in recent months, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan after the outlawed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan ended its ceasefire with the Pakistan government in 2022. In a report released in October, the Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) said that 386 security personnel lost their lives in the first nine months of 2023, reaching an eight-year high, Geo News reported. In the third quarter of 2023, some 445 people were killed and 440 others were injured from 190 terror attacks and counter-terror operations, Geo News reported. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan remained the prime centres for violence, reporting nearly 94 per cent of all fatalities and 89 per cent of attacks, including incidents of terrorism and security forces operations recorded during this time. Source: ANI 
Activists: Pakistan should Stop Mistreating Afghan Refugees
Some civil society activists in Pakistan demanded a stop to the forced deportation of Afghan refugees from this country. These protesters said that law enforcement agencies in Pakistan are persecuting Afghan refugees. The Islamic Emirate assured it has made necessary preparations to welcome the refugees and said that more than 400,000 people have returned to the country so far. Some members of the civil society, lawyers and legal and political activists of Pakistan started a rally and demanded to stop the arrests and forced deportations of Afghan refugees from Pakistan. The Joint Action Committee for refugees, which is one of the organizers of this protest, said in a newsletter that after Pakistan's decision to deport illegal refugees, Afghan refugees were harassed by the police and other law enforcement agencies. "They have asked Pakistan to stop the process of refugees being forcibly deported from here and to allow them to stay legally," said Sediq Kakar, an advocate in Pakistan. The Islamic Emirate said Pakistan's decision is cruel but the necessary preparations to deal with the refugees have been made. Zabihullah Mujahid added that more than 400,000 people have returned to the country so far. "The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan considers it its duty to resettle the refugees who return to their homeland and cooperate if we have the facilities and we are sure that the returnee refugees are more than 400,000," said Zabihullah Mujahid. Some returnees from Pakistan also talk about the bad behavior of Pakistani soldiers. "They destroyed our house, we had our own house. The Pakistani police forcibly dragged us and said that we will deport you and you have no right to stay in our country," said Mazuddin, a returnee. Earlier, the former foreign minister of Pakistan said that the policy of the interim government of this country regarding the deportation of illegal refugees is not clear. Source: tolonews.com
Activists in Pakistan urge calling off forced deportation of Afghan refugees
The civil society activists in Pakistan have demanded to halt the forced deportation of Afghan refugees from the country, as many of them continue to face harsh circumstances amid the ongoing situation, TOLOnews reported. A demonstration was organised by a few Pakistani lawyers, political activists, and members of civil society who wanted an end to the arrests and forceful removal of Afghan refugees from Pakistan. One of the protest organisers, the Joint Action Committee for Refugees, stated in a newsletter that Afghan refugees were subjected to harassment by the police and other law enforcement authorities following Pakistan’s decision to deport illegal immigrants, according to TOLOnews report. These demonstrators claimed that Afghan refugees are being persecuted by Pakistani law forces. “They have asked Pakistan to stop the process of refugees being forcibly deported from here and to allow them to stay legally,” TOLOnews quoted Sediq Kakar, an advocate in Pakistan, as saying. In response to Pakistan’s decision to deport Afghan migrants from the country by November, the Taliban has said that Islamabad’s decision is cruel but the necessary preparations to deal with the refugees have been made in the country. A senior Taliban official, Zabihullah Mujahid, has said that more than 400,000 individuals have returned to the nation thus far. “The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan considers it its duty to resettle the refugees who return to their homeland and cooperate if we have the facilities and we are sure that the returnee refugees are more than 400,000,” said Zabihullah Mujahid, according to TOLOnews. Meanwhile, a few refugees who returned from Pakistan also discussed their plight and described the despicable actions of the country’s military. “They destroyed our house; we had our own house. The Pakistani police forcibly dragged us and said that we will deport you and you have no right to stay in our country,” a returnee, Mazuddin, stated. According to human rights organisations in Afghanistan, half of the people expelled from Pakistan are women and addressing their needs is becoming increasingly challenging as winter approaches, as per the news report. Pakistan’s decision to expel over a million undocumented Afghan migrants starting in November this year has resulted in more than 327,000 Afghan migrants returning to Afghanistan, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). International human rights organisations have criticised Pakistan’s decision to expel undocumented Afghan migrants, which they have described as unjust, Khaama Press reported. Nearly 400,000 Afghan refugees have returned to Afghanistan from Pakistan in the past two months, TOLO News reported, citing the Taliban’s consul in Karachi, Abdul Jabar Takhari. According to Takhari, the detention of Afghan refugees is still happening at a high rate in Pakistan. He said that nearly 1,000 Afghan refugees are currently in detention. Pakistan’s interim government has decided to deport Afghan migrants forcefully from its country on November 1. 
No way out of IMF loans anytime soon, says Finance Minister Shamshad
The government has deferred its plans to issue a $1.5 billion international bond, Caretaker Finance Minister Shamshad Akhtar said on Thursday, stressing that the country will have to go for more IMF loan programmes for some time as the economy remains fragile. Her remarks came a day after the government reached a staff-level agreement with the International Monetary Fund on a nine-month bailout package. During a press briefing, Dr Akhtar outlined key aspects of the IMF agreement, affirming the government’s commitment to regular tariff adjustments, including a planned gas price hike in January to prevent the accumulation of circular debt in both the gas and power sectors. The electricity and gas rates would be “continuously revised” and their costs controlled besides transferring their management to the private sector as soon as possible and institutionalising ongoing campaign against power and gas theft, she said. She said Pakistan would also need to adhere to the market-determined exchange rate completely, remain responsive through adequate monetary policy adjustment, particularly to core inflation, and bring four more state-owned enterprises in line with the financing and governance template of the newly approved SOE law. These four state firms include the National Highway Authority (NHA), the Pakistan National Shipp¬ing Corporation (PNSC), the Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation (PBC), and the Pakistan Post.  Dr Akhtar also tried to allay concerns regarding the external financing gap, expressed confidence over the achievement of the tax collection target and said the government would remain committed to fiscal consolidation for macroeconomic stability and balanced growth. She said that unlike in the past, no prior action was required by the IMF management this time before approving the staff-level agreement, taking total releases under the $3bn programme to $1.9bn and leaving $1.1bn for the next and final review. Addressing the postponement of the new international bond, Dr Akhtar cited high interest rates and costly market conditions as key factors. “I have decided to postpone the new (international) bond. It is going to be expensive. Interest rates are very high. So, we cannot go to the international market,” she said, adding that the government would repay the $1bn bond that would be maturing in April next year. She said the government was working on some other avenues. In her view, the staff-level agreement would enable approvals of $1bn in loans from the World Bank ($350m), the Asian Development Bank ($350m) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (250m). Finance Secretary Imdadullah Bosal said these agreements were already “at an advanced stage” and were pending for the IMF’s staff-level agreement. He said negotiations with lenders for more funds under social protection, flood resilience and women’s inclusiveness programmes were also in the final stages. He, however, evaded the overall external financing needs, and the availability and gap for the current year, saying these were “dynamic numbers” despite budget allocations or announcements by the Economic Affairs Division. Mr Bosal said talks with some other commercial entities were also at an advanced stage to materialise $3.5bn projected commercial inflows. This would help launch a new international instrument — the Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) bond — rather than conventional bonds. He said the current account deficit would be lower than budgeted. Finance Minister Akhtar hoped to ensure a $2bn disbursement from the World Bank alone during the current fiscal year. “We are quite comfortable with external accounts,” she insisted, hoping that the IMF’s staff-level agreement, followed by disbursements from other multilaterals, would improve Pakistan’s credit rating. “The next [IMF] programme is very necessary for some time” as the economy had returned to stability that was still very fragile, the minister said. “Until we are able to increase exports and domestic resources, we will need another programme” because there was no more refuge from doing long-standing reforms. “The country will not survive without this,” she said. “Probably, we will have to go into another EFF [Extended Fund Facility]. We will remain engaged with the IMF,” she said but hastened to add that this may be premature to talk about. Dr Akhtar said her priority was to immediately start working on the last $1.1bn tranche under the current facility so that the new government should not face any difficulty, but “if we get time, we will also discuss this [new programme] as well. Responding to a question, she said the government would have to fast-track reforms in the SOEs to help improve business climate. There was no prior action, but laws governing the four SOEs — NHA, Pakistan Post, PBC and PNSC — have to be made compatible with the SOE law by Nov 30. Responding to another question, she said the government expected about Rs35bn in additional revenue through a windfall tax on banks on their massive foreign exchange earnings, “provided they pay” — an indication the government expected legal challenges from powerful banks. To another question, she said it had yet to be decided as to how much additional taxes would be imposed on retailers and real estate based on the expectation that the FBR would be able to deliver the Rs9.4 trillion revenue collection target. However, she agreed that the talks with the IMF also included trigger points to consider such options. Source: DAWN
New visa policy at Chaman border despite protest
Despite weeks-long protests by locals, traders and political parties, the government has started the implementation of new visa regime on the Chaman border crossing with Afghanistan. In November, the national apex committee, comprising civil and military officials, decided that only those with valid passports and visas would be allowed to cross the border. Earlier, Pakistanis and Afghans would cross the border upon showing either Pakistani or Afghan national identity card. The decision led to a sit-in, with the protesters claiming it would hurt nearly 40,000 people who depend on daily border crossings for their livelihoods. Balochistan Inform¬ation Minister Jan Achakzai has confirmed the development and said the new rules have been implemented despite “pressure from different quarters, including political parties”. He said all arrangements were already in place for the new policy, and intending travellers were visiting passport offices in Chaman, Qila Abdullah and other areas for new passports. “The Chaman passport office has issued over 1,000 tokens to applicants who applied for the passport,” Mr Achakzai told Dawn, adding that 200 passports have already been delivered. The passport facilities have been improved, and more centres opened up for timely delivery, the minister added. He said a one-time permission has been granted to Afghans who arrived in Chaman on Tazkira to enter their country. Upon their return to Pakistan, they will have to show a passport and visa, he told Dawn. Meanwhile, the Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund has initiated the distribution of productive livelihood assets to Afghan refugee families under a UNHCR-funded programme. Currently in its fourth phase, the programme is committed to empowering over 3,000 Afghan refugee families residing in six refugee camps in Nowshera, Quetta, Pishin, and Islamabad. Source: DAWN
Pak’s Disempower & Divide Strategy in Balochistan
The expulsion of Afghans by Pakistan  has not played well on the psyche of the border city of Chaman, Balochistan. To further aggravate the situation are Pakistan’s human rights violations and the ever-increasing Chinese interests in Gwadar through CPEC. The Chaman border is once again in the mainstream after the leader of the ‘Haq Do Gwadar Tehreek’ (Give Us Rights Movement) Maulana Hidayat-ur-Rahman Baloch was detained and subsequently prevented from attending the protest. A peaceful sit-in at the national highway in the Chaman district has been ongoing for nearly 4 weeks now, far from the media coverage and government attention. Yet the locals are determined, waiting to be granted rights over their land by the tyrannical government. Thousands of people are sitting at the porous Spin Boldak border asking for basic constitutional rights. Further, the banishment of Afghan descent folk who were promised shelter in Pakistan from unrest in Afghanistan for more than four decades has intensified the border climate. For the Pashtun citizenry, the border has always been non-existent. The sudden shift in Pakistan’s attitude towards neighboring Afghanistan is bound to break families on either side of the border. More than half of border dwellers have businesses and employment on the other side; the move will endanger their livelihood – an urgent concern in Balochistan given the Chinese takeover of their mineral-rich land. Chaman like other border areas neither has any fruit or crop yield, nor is there industry. How is the government then expecting the people to earn their livelihood? With the border now requiring passports and visas, the Pashtuns will further fall to the lowest financial strata of Pakistani society during the time of economic collapse and starvation. “The locals have been desperate for the government’s attention,” noted Hidayat-ur-Rahman, who has been jailed and detained several times. He fears for the fate of Balochistan amidst this crisis. If in the days preceding the elections, the political elite are ignoring the people, imagine how they they will treat them once in power. It is not the first time that Rahman has received backlash from the police and the Pak Army for his statements, yet he has persisted in the face of the Pak dictatorship. Rahman lamented, “We are being made slaves, we are arrested for calling a spade a spade!” He has been the mouthpiece for Balochistan’s seven-decade struggle for liberation from Pakistani colonization. The sit-in Haq Do protest was also joined by the popular leader of the National Democratic Movement, Mohsin Dawar. Local administration issued advisories against him, and the powerful circles ensured he was escorted back to the airport in Quetta and returned to Islamabad. Why the government is striving to contain the uprising in Chaman is a question for any reasonable citizen to reflect upon. Several Baloch police officials have been fired for showing sympathy to Afghan refugees. They were recorded criticizing the government’s decision to cruelly throw out the Afghan ethnic population and appealing to other officers to join the cause. It is widely known that the dictatorial rulers have continued dissenting the voices of the vulnerable. Several local leaders also claim that the extradition of Afghans is an excuse to increase the Pak Army footprint and surveillance in Balochistan. Clearly, it is the mockery of democracy in Pakistan. Rather than building better relations with Afghanistan and brainstorming solutions to the sudden Afghan expulsion, Pakistan is bent on building walls between ethnic Pashtun and Pathan communities on both sides of the border; this has always proved counterproductive. Reconciliation is far-fetched when Pakistan could not even give the Afghans an honorable return. With Afghan leadership’s prolonged silence, political analysts predict turbulent times ahead. Raising barriers between people by the use of force is not only wicked but a violation of human rights. The porous border was a symbol of brotherhood between both nations and raising the boundary will have serious repercussions. Source: Islam Khabar
Mian Saheb Back on Saddle
Three-time prime minister of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif has just returned home amidst rumours that he might achieve a rare first: become the first Pakistani to win a fourth term in the ballot on February 8, 2024.  For the past four years, he was in ‘self-exile’ in London, which was facilitated by the all-powerful military establishment at the behest of his younger brother, the resourceful Shehbaz Sharif. The Sharif brothers, particularly the Mian saheb, as Nawaz is known, know that anybody who takes control of the country now will have a very tough time dealing with a failed economy, Taliban menace, and restive population. With all the money that the likes of China and Saudi Arabia are pumping in, it will be years before Pakistan’s scrip sees the sunlight. The terrorists, particularly, the so-called Good Taliban, nurtured by the GHQ and its eyes and ears, ISI, have turned towards their patrons. This is amply evident from the Nov 4 attack on the Mianwali Training Air Base of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) and the swoop on the same day in Balochistan (on Gwadar port city fancied by the Chinese as their very own) and in the tribal belt bordering Afghanistan (in Dera Ismail Khan, to be precise).  The caretaker regime, which is executing the Army plan for political re-engineering and economic rejuvenation, has managed to anger its friendly neighbour, the one that was supposed to provide it with the comfort of ‘strategic depth’ beyond the Durand Line the British era border that divides Pakistan and Afghanistan. No Pakistani utters the phrase ‘strategic depth’ any longer; Well, every Pakistani from the mighty Generals to the man in the street- is now embarrassed to realize how foolishly Islamabad – Rawalpindi combine has been acting as the leading votary for global recognition of the Taliban regime. Millions of Afghan refugees who had escaped from the brutalities of the Taliban are being forced back into Afghanistan—not only against their own wishes but even of Kabul, which is extremely angry over Pakistani unilateralism.  Against this backdrop, Pakistan cannot hope to get respite from the cross-border attacks. The much-publicized refugee eviction carries not the imprint of the Foreign Office but of the Army headquarters, which, as a commentator says, thinks through its berets and khaki shoes. As pointed out, the military establishment cannot escape blame for the mess. Its penchant to run from behind as Big Brother is not a new development. But this time around, under Chief, General Syed Asim Munir, the Army is mostly on the direct line of action to the dismay of old-timers. The present caretaker Prime Minister, Anwaar ul Haq Kakar is a Pushtun from Balochistan, and is the choice of the army. Army chiefs and Corps Commanders are dictating the course of the economy as members of a newly formed quasi-military forum which is nominally headed by the Prime Minister. Usually, the ‘neutral’ temporary government functions for three months by which time general elections are to be held. Yet, under the pretext of completing delimitation of constituencies, the polls were pushed initially indefinitely. Big noise by political parties and the vigilantism of the Supreme Court made the poll body opt for a Feb 8 ballot. All this and much more, has made Nawaz Sharif’s face a hurdle race, literally. He has to first clear the disqualification bar and then get clearance in the pending graft cases. It is only then, that Nawaz, the campaigner can enter the poll fray.  Nawaz’s beta noire, Imran Khan also faces similar handicaps on his way to realising the dream of having sway over whatever he surveys from his sprawling Bani Gala estate in Islamabad.   While whether Imran Khan would be allowed to enter the fray is still unclear, his incarceration does not seem to be making much difference in his popularity sweepstakes. And the poll results will not be adversely affected even if Imran is not allowed to contest, as is very likely.   If Nawaz Sharif indeed succeeds in taking over the reins once again, he will have completed a unique roller coaster ride in the topsy-turvy politics of the land that was carved out of British India as home to the Muslims of the subcontinent seven decades ago. He became prime minister for the first time in 1990. It was a feat blessed by the army – the chief minister of Punjab (Pakistan) was promoted to the prime minister of the country. His second innings began in 1993 and lasted for about three years. He returned in 1997 and this time he was ousted by the military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf in 1999. In fact, a remarkable thing about his three tenures as prime minister was that on each occasion, he failed to complete the five-year term. Relations between him and the army soured during his later years in office. Not just because he was embroiled in a controversy over what was known as the Panama Papers and faced corruption charges but because the real rulers of Pakistan thought he was abandoning the traditional anti-India hardline as a recipe for tackling some of the chronic economic problems of the country. The courts awarded him a jail sentence and he was disqualified from holding any public office. That was in 2011. It appeared Sharif, the politician had run his course. His one-time benefactor, the army, appeared reluctant to bail him out but the GHQ did help, maybe without knowing how it would play out when it facilitated imprisoned Sharif’s shift to London for medical treatment. He was expected to return to the jail after the treatment was completed but somehow, the treatment in London never seemed to end and Sharif stayed on. Rest is history as the saying goes. The turn of events in the past month shows luck has not deserted Nawaz, at least as yet. The mighty Khakis have developed an aversion towards their one-time blue-eyed boy, Imran Khan. The former Pakistani cricket idol had assumed that by virtue of his vast popularity, he did not have to take orders from GHQ. He built himself as pro-Islamist and anti-West and pandered to the fundamentalists. Imran’s interference in some top army transfers and postings infuriated the Generals. An issue that became a cause celebre was his opposition to the general appointed as the ISI director by the then chief of army staff. As well as his open tirade against General Qamar Bajwa, who had installed him as PM after sacking Nawaz. The general Imran Khan had opposed is now the chief of the army staff. He is in a position to play with the political career of Imran Khan and that for sure would not be to the latter’s liking. Undoubtedly, the Pakistan Army has also lost the “geostrategic heft” it enjoyed with the West in “controlling and directing” the Taliban. The Cipher Gate, perpetuated by the Imran regime made relations with the US messier. As a commentator says, “The open praise for the Taliban for its role in ‘countering international terror groups’ in Afghanistan by US President Joe Biden can be said to have eroded the Pak army’s exalted position in counter-terrorism interests of the West in the region”. Nonetheless, China has not given up its stake in the wellbeing of the Pak Army since Beijing is extending its Belt and Road Initiative into Afghanistan from the land of the pure. China was not happy with Bajwa sacking Nawaz in 2017 and favouring Imran in the 2018 elections.  Put simply, Nawaz has every reason to sport a smile. For how long is a question that will be debated over cups of Chinese tea? Any doubt? Source : Asian Lite